Click Below

  • On February 25th 2006 AWOT organized a Teach-In against the War on Terror at the CUNY Graduate Center in New York City. Now Streaming...
  • The war on terror is an attempt to make security the highest goal of American life. Our leaders have reduced politics to questions of mere survival, in which even the smallest risks are viewed as overriding threats to national existence. We at Against the War on Terror aim to challenge this view and the apparent need to eliminate fear itself. The preservation of bare life cannot and should not guide our political activity and dominate our public culture. We reject the very premise of the war on terror....Read On
Taking a Break for 2007
In preparation for the New Year AWOT will be posting less often. We are taking time to develop new ideas and new Political events for the spring. Regular commentary will resume shortly.

Saturday, January 28, 2006

Reconstructing Incompetence

First, something you probably already know: it is now official, the president is incompetent. After two and a half years of trying to figure out how to organize an unplanned reconstruction effort, his own Inspector General reported yesterday that the process is still marked 'by gross understaffing, a lack of technical expertise, bureaucratic infighting [and] secrecy.' The anti-imperialists out there would do well to consider how an imperial power could make so little effort to plan out the various scenarious and guarantee its interests, especially since the so-called neoconservatives had allegedly been preparing for this war ever since the US pulled up short of the Iraqi border in 1991. Contrast that with FDR, who began planning every aspect of German reconstruction in 1941, and you have to admit, we're dealing with something different, which old slogans don't quite fit.

Some further evidence, that may have escaped your attention: reconstruction blues are not just a foreign affair. The recent Medicare shenanigans suggest Bush is even more incapable of implementing his will at home. Since Bush's signature domestic reform took effect on January 1, there has been such substantial confusion and mishap that 'at least 25 states and the District have had to defray the costs to seniors that [Medicare reform] was supposed to cover'. Specific examples of chaos include 20 percent of California's Medicaid recipients losing coverage, and Maine's state assistance line logging 18,000 calls by January 3. Again, a historical example illustrates the scope of the failure to plan. When LBJ created Medicare--that's right, created it from scratch--he planned for all kinds of contingencies amongst a complex environment that included requiring hospitals to conform with civil rights legislation, and limited hospital capacity. As Jonathan Cohn reports in this illuminating New Republic piece, LBJ had helicopters in place to ferry patients from overloaded hospitals to ones with spare capacity and he had the program start in the summer, when hospital demand is the lowest. In the end, newspaper headlines read 'MEDICARE TAKES OVER EASILY'.

The relevance for our immediate political concerns is this: incompetence is an accurate description of what we're dealing with, but the deeper point is that we are facing an arbitrary power. It is arbitray not in the sense that it is unregulated, but in the sense that it has little sense of its long-term interests. This is not specific to Bush. Clinton's presidency, too, was famously about crisis-managment. He may have been somewhat better at it than Bush, but as a strategic actor, he was still unpredictable, cooking up foreign and domestic policy as he went along. In a peculiar way, this makes the task of opposition more difficult. There was a certain solidity and straightforwardness to the anti-imperialist line of the past, which makes it seductive but also probably wrong. Critiquing bunglers is in certain ways more difficult than more calculating enemies.

4 Comments:

George said...

I do agree, what exactly are the plans for reconstruction in Iraq? There is no clear cut objective, and if there was any it has been lost. Furthermore, I have always emphasized the strong correlation between Vietnam and Iraq. In this respect, in Vietnam the United States lost its objective and that’s why the Vietnam War has gone in history as the longest war the United States fought (10,000 days.) Evidently, one sees the same thing happening in Iraq, what will be “mission accomplished” in Iraq? Is it Democracy or Elections? Clearly, not even Mr. Donald or Ms. Rice can answer these questions. Consequently, one is led to believe there is more to this Iraq thing than just the United States taking on its defacto role as world police, or crusader of democracy.

1:17 PM  
ddjango said...

I've spent no little amount of time lately trying to disabuse folks of the notion that The Doubleduh-Cheney Gang is incompetent. Thanks for yet another opportunity to do this.

Incompetence is defined as a lack of skills to achieve one's intentions. In the case of this administration, that is not the case. In government, they have achieved exactly what they've wanted to achieve: disabling and dismantling. In war, they've also done what they've set out to do: creating chaos and the conditions for endless war ('cuz it makes them rich and keeps them in power).

Incompetent? I think not. Evil? Heh - do I need to answer that?

1:35 PM  
Ellen1910 said...

TED KOPPEL (Off Camera) And we're back once again with ANDREW NATSIOS, administrator for the Agency for International Development. I want to be sure that I understood you correctly. You're saying the, the top cost for the US taxpayer will be $1.7 billion. No more than that?

ANDREW NATSIOS For the reconstruction. And then there's 700 million in the supplemental budget for humanitarian relief, which we don't competitively bid 'cause it's charities that get that money.

TED KOPPEL (Off Camera) I understand. But as far as reconstruction goes, the American taxpayer will not be hit for more than $1.7 billion no matter how long the process takes?

ANDREW NATSIOS That is our plan and that is our intention. And these figures, outlandish figures I've seen, I have to say, there's a little bit of hoopla involved in this.

Nightline, April 23, 2003 (transcript)

9:18 PM  
brent said...

The New York Times compared prewar infrastructure reports to those made at the end of last year.

Electricity is down 505 megawatts.
Hours of electricity per day is down in Baghdad by 12-20.
Daily oil production down by half a billion barrels (and how much of that leaks out anyway?).
Daily petroleum by 2300 tons.
Percentage of the population with drinking water down by 18% (and much of that water is not truly potable).
Percentage with sewage services down by 4%.
Admittedly, electricity hours are up in the rest of Iraq by 2-6 hours, but it is hardly the miracle those Halliburton ads would have us believe (you remember, Halliburton lets soldiers hear their babies voices, don't tell me you hate soldier's babies... forgetting the fact that they could have been in the delivery room had they never been sent over there in the first place... I'm sure Goering is getting a big kick out of such propogandist capitalist campaigns..).

It makes me wonder what life would have been like if MAIN had succeeded back in the 80s in Iraq as they did with the House of Saud...

So Robert Stein pleads guilty and we are expected to believe corruption will disappear. Halliburton creates a new marketing campaign and we forget Cheney's still on the payroll.

What it may come down to is that the inmates are not running the asylum; nor are the doctors. Or, to put it better, no one can tell one from another any longer. When Economic Hit-Men (EHMs) are just called economists or realists, and the jackals tout military aggression as a right and obligation, not merely a virtue, then power is lost. The Emperor's throne is missing, and anyone nearby is free to sit as they like.

The most confusing thing is that black and white concepts like motivation and interest seem to have little meaning... is it a form of philosophical anarchy? Do the Japanese have it right, never leaving their rooms until they make an online suicide pact? Was the preacher in True Stories right about the Trilateral Commission? Does humor still have a place, or is it just a desperate need not to scream?

Seriously, though, today's world finds more conflict management being the purview of NGOs and grassroots projects (Burundi, Rwanda, et al.) than the work of TNCs and US Foreign Policy. It is impossible to truly predict the long-term effects of the invasion until civil society has a chance (if it has one) to move in. At least, what is left of my youthful idealism struggles to believe that this may be true. All that is known now is that the US had no exit strategy, that reconstruction money was thrown about within the confines of the predictable circles of the elite, and that Iraq is just not doing all that well. So, has anything really changed? When Mom and Dad know nothing, but insist on setting the rules, the kids just do what they want once they're in bed. After all, there are metal bands in Baghdad, and Clinton blundered the "war" in Bosnia, but it was quite the amazing spectacle to see all those kids in front of the palace where Milosevic was hiding out.

It seems I have said much while saying little. Watch out McClellan...

5:43 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home