Click Below

  • On February 25th 2006 AWOT organized a Teach-In against the War on Terror at the CUNY Graduate Center in New York City. Now Streaming...
  • The war on terror is an attempt to make security the highest goal of American life. Our leaders have reduced politics to questions of mere survival, in which even the smallest risks are viewed as overriding threats to national existence. We at Against the War on Terror aim to challenge this view and the apparent need to eliminate fear itself. The preservation of bare life cannot and should not guide our political activity and dominate our public culture. We reject the very premise of the war on terror....Read On
Taking a Break for 2007
In preparation for the New Year AWOT will be posting less often. We are taking time to develop new ideas and new Political events for the spring. Regular commentary will resume shortly.

Monday, January 23, 2006

Stop the Program!

In an interview this evening with Jim Lehrer on the Lehrer News Hour, we heard Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez say 'If you listen very carefully to the critics, none of them, or very few of them, are saying stop the program.' He was referring to the NSA spying, and thought public opinion was actually with the administration on the grounds that this is narrow and focused spying. When he puts it like that, Gonzalez sounds ridiculous—lots of people are against the program as it stands now. For example, a group of Democratic Senators are sponsoring a resolution to reject the administration's arguments. But no doubt Gonzalez is right that most objections are to the fact that the administration didn't go through the FISA courts or other legal channels, not to the spying itself.

The real problem with the surveillance is not merely that it's illegal, nor that it is focused or not—although those are concerns. What's really at stake is the subtler effect these programs have on our political culture: each time we accept the administration's arguments, no matter how small the new power it acquires, we also renew our willingness to accept the idea that we are at war and under a security emergency. The program should be rejected on the ground that we are not and should not be at war; quit trying to convince us that we cannot enjoy our liberties because our survival is at stake. On the off-chance that Gonzalez is listening, we are happy to be one of the vocal few: Stop the Program!

1 Comments:

AF said...

I'm not sure I follow this argument. You say the problem with the program isn't that it's illegal or overbroad, but that it furthers the politics of war and emergency. But it does this because it is illegal and overbroad. If Bush were willing to go through Congress and to narrowly focus the program, he wouldn't be asking the public to "accept the idea that we are at war and under a security emergency." He would simply be addressing a security problem (which we surely do have) through legitimate democratic avenues. The problem with the NSA program consists precisely in the fact that Bush claimed the right to do it in secret without Congress's approval. You're right that the real problem is political, rather than legal, but in this case the illegality is the political problem.

2:10 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home